THE Caries Preventing Restorative for Patients who need eXtra Care.
The specific properties of Dyract® materials are the result of combining fluoride glass fillers and polyacid modified, polymerisable monomers, proprietary to DENTSPLY.
Dyract® restorations release fluoride ions. Due to the high amount of fluoride in the filling (10% w/w) the continuous fluoride release [1] is ensured over a very long period of time. A study over three years demonstrated that the long term fluoride release is comparable to glass ionomers [2].
In-vitro investigations showed that this fluoride release leads to a significantly better protection against demineralization compared to composite [3] under artificially simulated caries attacks.
In addition, in-vitro investigations proved that Dyract® AP buffers lactic acid. Simultaneously the fluoride release increases under acidic conditions [4].
Whether these properties protect adjacent enamel in oral cavities of volunteers wearing appliances with simulated approximal contacts was evaluated in an in situ study[5]. Dyract® eXtra supported prevention of approximal caries.
A quite interesting outcome was demonstrated under different investigational approaches. The water uptake due to the specifically formulated matrix leads to a reduction of the shrinkage induced by the light curing [6].
Aside these in-vitro findings, it is the numerous clinical data [7] showing evidence that the Dyract® restorative system is clinically reliable.
In one clinical trial on 53 patients with a total of 56 pairs of restorations (Dyract® AP / composite) a success rate of 94.6% was reported after 2 years. Secondary caries was found in three cases for composite restorations, only. Even though Dyract® AP was used according to the Directions for use in a non-etch technique [8].
This positive result was even surpassed in a long-term clinical trial reporting 94% success after a period of 4 years [9].
Based on the findings of a huge number of in-vitro studies, the very high success rate in clinical trials, and the experience gathered from usage in daily practice over 11 years, we came to the conclusion that the usage of Dyract® materials lead to evidence based restorations offering eXtra care due to their specific properties.
[1] Measurements by DENTSPLY DeTrey
[2] Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A (2002). Long-term fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement, a compomer, and from experimental resin composites. Acta Odontol Scand. 2002 Mar;60(2):93-7.
[3] Attar N, Önen A (2002). Artificial formed caries-like lesions around esthetic restorative materials. J Clin Pediatr Dent 26:3;289-296.
Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Papadogiannis Y, Konstantinidis A (1998). Artificial secondary caries around two new F-containing restoratives. Operative Dentistry 23;81-86.
Donly K, Grandgenett C (1998). Dentin demineralization inhibition at restoration margins of vitemer, dyract and compoglass. Am J Dent 11:5;245-248.
Hicks J, Garcia Godoy F, Milano M, Flaitz C (2000). Compomer materials and secondary caries formations. Am J Dent 13:5;231-234.
[4] Attin T, Kielbassa AM, Plogmann S, Hellwig E (1996). Fluoridfreisetzung aus Kompomeren im sauren und neutralen Milieu. DZZ 51:11;675-678.
[5] Lennon ÁM, Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T (2007). Approximal caries development in contact with fluoride releasing and non-fluoride releasing restorative materials – an in situ study. Eur J Oral Sci 115:497-501
[6] Pioch T. AfG (Working Group for basic research) annual meeting 2000
Yap AUJ, Shah KC, Chew CL (2001). Effect of water storage on dentin marginal gap formation. J Dent Res 80:SI;0507.
[7] Data of 41 clinical studies is on file and proves the safety and efficiency of Dyract filling materials.
[8] Beetke E, Palis L, Jentsch H (2001). Füllungstherapie mit einem Feinpartikelhybridkomposit und Kompomer in Klasse-I- und II-Kavitäten. Autorenreferat DGZ-Tagung Gürzenich, Köln; 40.
[9] Benz C, Hickel R. Die Qualität von Klasse-II-Kompomerfüllungen nach 4 Jahren.(DZZ; submitted and accepted for publication)
Information on diagnosis, treatment planning and re-evaluation with patients requiring eXtra care
The following information, which is intended as a guide for correct preventive treatment, is taken from the handbook, “Professional prophylaxis in the dental practice“ (2nd Edition, 2003), German Chamber of Dentists (BZÄK). Handbooks on this and other topics can be obtained from the BZÄK.
We would like to thank the BZÄK for their kind permission to print extracts from the handbook.
1. Anamnesis
A professional anamnesis, family anamnesis as well as medical anamnesis (e.g. general illnesses, long-term medication, injuries, operations, traumata, evaluation of the patient’s general condition), behavioural anamnesis (e.g. dietary and oral hygiene habits, smoking, inability or unwillingness to cooperate) and oral health data (e.g. according to the Oral Health Impact Profile, OHIP) not only provide personal data but also important information about the (medical) history of the patient and are important factors in determining subsequent intervention.
2. Oral cavity records
Existing fillings, carious lesions and factors that affect the risk of caries or periodontitis should be recorded. All these factors have to be assessed before a proper diagnosis can be made.
2.1 Hard tissue records
2.2 Soft tissue records
2.3 Clinical functional analysis
2.4 Tooth position and occlusal relationship anomalies – orthodontic records
2.5 Changes to the oral mucosa
2.6 Other records
Localised X-ray diagnosis (e.g. bite wing X-rays) and laser optics are options for determining the severity of the caries.
3. Assessing the risk of oral disease, diagnosis and treatment planning
Risk assessment is based on various factors, e.g. the duration and extent of caries or periodontitis in the patient, the amount of pathogenic bacteria and any other parameters that also affect the disease, e.g. standard of oral hygiene and nutrition. In a risk assessment these risk factors are used with specific weighting factors, which allow the risk to be assessed as high, medium or low (cf. ADA chart for assessment of a high caries risk). The level of risk determines the extent of preventive measures, some of which can be carried out by the patient as well as professionally in the practice. The ratio between domestic and professional preventive measures depends in part on the cooperation and capability of the patient. Records of existing caries, defects in restorations, lesion activity as well as the level of risk are all assessed by the dentist in making a correct diagnosis specific to the tooth area. This diagnosis is the basis for determining preventive and treatment requirements.
There are different options for preventive and treatment measures depending on the risk of caries or periodontitis and the actual diagnosis. After informing the patient of the options, the dentist has to decide in consultation with the patient on an appropriate strategy for intervention and prevention.
Cooperation on the part of the patient and the patient’s financial circumstances should be taken into account as well as dental and clinical considerations.
4. Appropriate prophylactic intervention
The primary function of preventive measures is to reduce causal and predisposed risk factors and the secondary function is to support the treatment of existing carious, gingival or periodontal lesions.
The type of prophylaxis depends on the results of the risk assessment; in principle, this does not depend on the age of the patient and should in fact be available to patients throughout their life. For children and teenagers up to the age of 16/18 years prophylactic treatment is currently financed within the parameters of the GKV (statutory health insurance). The latter applies to Germany, only.
4.1 Oral hygiene
The main aim of preventive treatment is to provide an effective oral hygiene regime that suits the age of the patient; preventive treatment can be supported by additional measures for showing up plaque (colouring agent) before and after oral hygiene measures to indicate problem areas and achieve improvement. The patient should be given advice on the correct oral hygiene aids (e.g. toothbrush, dental floss, interdental brush, dental sticks, toothpaste) as well as the correct oral hygiene technique. This should be preceded by scaling and polishing.
4.2 Fluoride application
A professional local application of fluoride gel or varnish is recommended if there is an increased risk of caries; in the case of a moderate risk two applications are recommended twice a year and with a high risk two applications are recommended at least every three months or even every week. The importance of fluoride application by brushing the teeth twice a day with fluoride toothpaste, without rinsing thoroughly after brushing, should again be underlined.
4.3 Chemical plaque reduction
Plaque reduction can be effectively supported on the one hand by mechanical oral hygiene using a toothbrush, dental floss and interdental brushes particularly in the approximal area and on the other hand by pharmaceutical solutions.
Chlorhexidine solutions with 0.1 – 0.2 % active substance can be used effectively as a rinse for reducing plaque; these solutions have a high substantivity and are crucial in the treatment of periodontal problems. Any side effects such as brown discoloration, mucosal irritation or impairment of taste should be noted, though these can be controlled with good mechanical oral hygiene.
Rinses containing amine fluoride, tin fluoride or triclosan are also recommended for plaque reduction.
4.4 Nutrition
Individual nutritional advice, if possible based on a diet protocol, can contribute to caries prevention in children and teenagers by highlighting any hidden sugar content and by helping change diet-related exposure frequencies. Even in an adult a sudden change of dietary habits (new drink) can contribute to an increased risk of caries.
There is also a connection between modern dietary habits and greater exposure of the oral cavity to acidic products, which increases the risk of erosion. In the case of illnesses like bulimia, anorexia or alcoholism there is continual etching of the tooth structure by gastric acid.
4.5 Medication
Finally, long-term medication that can lead to reduced salivary flow with increased bacteria count and even candida infection in older patients should be noted during patient consultation and examination.
5. Preventive re-evaluation – Recall
In accordance with systematic, preventive-orientated dental and oral medicine, successful treatment is followed by a preventive re-evaluation to assess the risk of oral disease and to motivate the patient. The risk of oral disease can only be determined by repeated assessment of the oral risk factors.
5.1 Determining caries activity
Caries activity can only be assessed retrospectively following re-evaluation of the extent of the caries and in particular initial carious lesions (white spots on smooth surfaces and discoloured fissures or pits).
During clinical examination it is, however, possible to assess caries activity based on the structure of the lesion. Active carious lesions depend on the standard of oral hygiene and are usually covered with plaque before examination. They have a dull, rough appearance in the enamel, while inactive lesions have more of a shiny appearance and are more frequently plaque-free.
ADA chart for assessing a high caries risk*
Age and group classification for recall patients
| Children / Teenagers | Adults |
| ³2 carious lesions in the past year Previous smooth surface caries Increased streptococcus mutans count Deep pits and fissures No / minimum systemic or local fluoride application Poor oral hygiene Frequent sugar exposure Irregular visits to dentist Inadequate salivary flow Bottle-fed or breast-fed for too long (small children) |
³2 carious lesions in the past three years Previous root caries Large number of exposed tooth necks Increased streptococcus mutans count Deep pits and fissures Poor oral hygiene Frequent sugar exposure Inadequate local fluoride application Irregular visits to dentist |
*Source:
Caries Diagnosis and Risk Assessment.
A Review of Preventive Strategies and Management, JADA, Vol. 126, June 1995 7-S
– Extract–
5.2 Determining the risk of caries
Causal and predisposed factors, which mainly involve the assessment of caries activity (DMFT and DMFS) and initial caries, are recorded to assess the risk of caries; it is important to assess caries activity as a whole and not just the individual components! Functional saliva parameters (pH, buffer capacity, flow rate) can also be recorded and the bacterial saliva parameters (streptococcus mutans, lactobacilli count) determined. As well as determining the pH of the oral cavity with the saliva test, it is now also possible to determine the amount of lactic acid in the oral cavity produced by plaque.
Source:
BUNDESZAHNÄRZTEKAMMER (Hrsg.) (2003): Qualifizierte Prophylaxe in der Zahnarztpraxis – Leitfaden der Bundeszahnärztekammer, 2nd Edition fully revised and updated; P. 31-34